William J. Kovatch, Jr., Attorney at Law, PLLC

Located in Alexandria, Virginia, we specialize in the legal needs of the elderly community. From estate planning to guardianships to Medicaid planning to special needs trusts, we strive to provide the best quality legal advice suited to your needs, values and goals.

Sunday, December 9, 2012

Help Me Raise Money for the Cub Scouts!



Want to help me do something goofy and raise money for my Cub Scout pack?  Check out this video.  If I receive a total of $500 in donations to the Cub Scout Pack 95 before the annual Blue and Gold Banquet, I will dye my hair a goofy color scheme. Not only that, I will publish photos on the Internet.

I'm not afraid to get goofy in front of my boys for a reason.  And this seems like a good enough reason.

Plus, as an added incentive, you get to choose the color scheme.  The color scheme getting the most donations wins.  You vote with your dollars.  Your choices:  (1) blue and white to represent my high school, J.R. Masterman; (2) orange and green to represent my undergrad school, the University of Miami; (3) red, white and blue to represent my graduate school, The American University; or (4) scarlet and white to represent my law school, Temple University.  But wait, you could go off the board.  My daughter has suggested neon pink and purple.

If you would like to donate, make your checks out to Cub Scout Pack 95.  Mail them to me at: William J. Kovatch, Jr., 2121 Eisenhower Avenue, Suite 200, Alexandria, VA 22314.

Friday, December 7, 2012

Supreme Court to Address Same Sex Marriages

The Supreme Court announced that it would hear two cases which involve same-sex marriages.  One case is from California, and concerns a ban on same sex marriages approved by California voters.  The other is an appeal from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit which held that part of the Defense of Marriage Act was unconstitutional.

The Second Circuit case concerned a lesbian couple who had married in Canada, but lived in New York.  One spouse died, leaving her estate to her surviving spouse.  The surviving spouse claimed the marital deduction against the federal estate tax.  The Second Circuit held that the Defense of Marriage Act, which prohibits the Federal Government from recognizing same-sex marriages, violated the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

The move by the Court does not necessarily mean that the Court will reach the central issue of whether same-sex marriages should be recognized in the United States.  Nonetheless, a possible outcome of the cases could be the resolution of whether same-sex couples can enjoy the same benefits under federal law as heterosexual couples.

By:  William J. Kovatch, Jr.
(703) 837-8832
info@kovatchelderlaw.com

Thursday, November 8, 2012

The Pro Se Guardianship Proceeding

I don't want to sound as if I want to restrict access to our courts.  However, there is a trend, at least here in Fairfax County, Virginia, that has me concerned.  That trend is the rise in number of pro se guardianship petitions, or guardianship petitions that are filed without the help of a lawyer.

I understand the reason these petitions get filed without a lawyer.  Usually, there is a well-intentioned family member who just wants to make sure that an older person who appears more and more confused is getting the help they need.  In many cases, resources are tight, and the family member wants to try to avoid spending a lot of money.

Indeed, guardian petitions are costly.  This is one of the reasons why I warn people that they should put a comprehensive estate plan in place.  If drafted properly, a few dollars spent now can avoid thousands of dollars in expense and hassle down the road.  To properly pursue a guardianship petition, you should expect to pay a lawyer somewhere between $1,500 to $2,500, to pay a court-appointed guardian ad litem somewhere between $1,000 to $2,500, court costs of a little under $100, and additional costs such as doctor's fees, surety fees and other expenses

Even though the petitioners appear to be well-intentioned, and may resent the notion that they have to spend thousands of dollars out of their own pockets to pursue a guardianship case in Virginia, there is a reason for it.  A guardianship petition should never be taken lightly.  First, in Virginia, anyone can file a guardianship petition against anyone else.  If successful, the petitioner will be taking away numerous fundamental rights from the potential ward.  This could include the right to make medical decisions, the right to control your finances, the right to drive, and the right to vote.  Given the seriousness of the matter, courts simply cannot grant guardianship petitions on a whim.  They must be supported by evidence, and the potential ward must be given the meaningful right to contest the proceeding.

Those who file guardianship petitions pro se are often surprised to find out how they work in Virginia.  Before a guardian can be appointed, there must be an evaluation by a licensed health care worker who certifies that the person is incapacitated.  When the guardianship petition is filed a lawyer, called a guardian ad litem, is appointed to provide guidance to the court.  The guardian ad litem is required to investigate the matter, interview all of the relevant players, including family members and doctors, review all relevant information, including medical reports and financial records, and give a report to the court on whether a guardian is necessary.  This takes time.  And, that time gets billed.  Petitioners who choose not to hire their own lawyer are often surprised to find out that Virginia law places the cost of all of this on them.

To be certain, if a guardianship petition is granted, it is possible to get the court to order that the costs associated with the petition be borne by the ward, assuming the ward has sufficient funds.  In some cases, if the ward is indigent, the cost of the guardian ad litem is paid by the Commonwealth.  But, petitioners are taking the risk that all of the expenses will come out of their pocket.

Then, there is the case of the contested guardianship.  In most cases, the guardian is appointed through a simple hearing after the guardian ad litem files the report with the court.  But, if the potential ward objects, then there may need to be a hearing where the rules of evidence apply.  In fact, the potential guardian has the right to insist on a jury trial.  All of this adds to the hassle and expense.  Indeed, a contested guardianship case can cost n the tens of thousands of dollars in lawyer's fee, including the fee of the guardian ad litem.

Filing a guardian petition without a lawyer is also unfair to the guardian ad litem.  The guardian ad litem's role is not to be the layer of the petitioner.  It is to represent the best interests of the potential ward.  Yet, when a guardian petition is filed without a lawyer, inevitably legal requirements, such as the need for a doctor's evaluation, are overlooked.  This places the guardian ad litem in the very uncomfortable position.  Should the guardian ad litem help out the petitioner, and in effect do things that the petitioner's counsel would have done?  Or should the guardian ad litem simply recommend rejecting the petition for failing to meet the legal requirements, and foot the petitioner with a bill for his or her services in doing so.

And all of this is why pursuing a guardianship petition without a lawyer is a very bad idea.  Petitioners need to be forewarned on exactly what the process involves, and how much it can cost.  In the end, hiring a lawyer to guide you through the process will save everyone involved in the process time and expense, while protecting the rights of the potential ward.

By:  William J. Kovatch, Jr.
(703) 837-8832
info@kovatchelderlaw.com

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Using Trusts and Powers of Attorney in Your Estate Plan

There are various tools that you can use in your estate plan to make sure that your property is handled the way you want.  Two such tools are the trust and the power of attorney.

A trust is a legal arrangement where one person, a trustee, holds and manages property for the benefit of another person, the beneficiary.  Through a trust agreement, the trustee is given instructions on what to do with the property held in trust.  This includes instructions on what to do with the property once the beneficiary has died.

The most common type of trust used in estate plans is the inter vivos, or living, revocable trust.  The owner of the property appoints himself or herself as both the trustee and the beneficiary.  He or she then appoints a successor trustee to take over when the original trustee dies or becomes incapacitated.  The trust includes instructions on what to do with the property upon the owner's death.

Revocable living trusts are commonly used to avoid probate.  That is, by owning your property through a trust, you do not have to file it with the probate division of the court, and go through the expensive and tedious process of probate.  In Virginia, where every estate with more than $50,000 (exclusive of real estate) must go through probate, using a living trust can save your heirs money and hassle after your death.

But, revocable living trusts can have other purposes.  They include assisting an older person who needs hep managing money by appointing a co-trustee to help make financial decisions. 

A power of attorney is a document that appoints a person to make decisions for you.  You appoint an agent, also known as an attorney-in-fact.  Your agent has the power to act as if her or she were you.  That can make it easier for you to have someone do your banking or sign documents in a real estate transaction.  Of course, since the agent can do things on your behalf, you better make sure your agent is a person you trust to act in your best interests.  Powers of attorney can be limited.  An example is a power of attorney to complete a real estate transaction while you are out of town.  Powers of attorney can also be general.  This is where you appoint an agent to do anything you can do.  They should also be durable, meaning that the powers of attorney is effective even when you are incapacitated.

The most common reason to have a power of attorney is to protect your estate from the need to engage in guardianship proceedings.  That is, if you become incapacitated, and you do not have a power of attorney, then in order for someone to take care of your estate for you, that person would have to go through a guardianship proceeding.  Guardianship proceedings are expensive and can be embarrassing.  By contrast, a power of attorney is usually a fairly simple and inexpensive document to create.

I go into more detail on trusts and powers of attorney in this article.

When you are ready to discuss you estate plan, you should contact a knowledgeable attorney to discuss the options available and the advantages and disadvantages of each option.

By:  William J. Kovatch, Jr.
(703) 837-8832
info@kovatchelderlaw.com

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

A Family with Young Children Should Have a Comprehensive Protection Plan

If you have young children, you should put together your Comprehensive Family Protection Plan.  A will is simply not enough.  You need to ensure that you have appointed a guardian for your children, should you meet your untimely demise, and given instructions to all of your loved ones on how to proceed.

I go into more detail on exactly what you Comprehensive Family Protection Plan should look like in this article.

Make an appointment now so we can discuss how best to protect your family.

By:  William J. Kovatch, Jr.
(703) 837-8832
info@kovatchelderlaw.com

Sunday, October 21, 2012

Social Security and Retiring Overseas



Some people look forward to retirement as an opportunity to live overseas.  It may be a chance to spend some time relaxing on a tropical island in the Caribbean.  Perhaps it is time to open a boutique or restaurant in an exotic location.  Or maybe, retirement is a chance to give back to the community, by performing a service, such as medical care, at low-cost or no charge to people of an impoverished nation.

Whatever the reason, retiring to live overseas may raise a number of legal and financial questions.  Will living overseas affect Social Security benefits? What about working overseas?  Are there tax issues to consider?

For U.S. citizens, the good news is that for the most part, living overseas will not affect your ability to collect Social Security retirement benefits.  Such benefits are contingent on your working for 40 qualifying quarters.  So long as you have those 40 quarters of earnings, and reach the right age, you can collect Social Security retirement benefits.  The payment of benefits to U.S. citizens does not depend on U.S. residency.  You can choose to have those benefits deposited in the United States or to another country, with the exception of Cuba, North Korea, Cambodia, Vietnam or areas that were in the former Soviet Union (other than Armenia, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Russia).

For non-U.S. citizens, otherwise eligible for Social Security benefits, the issue is a little more complicated.  Currently, citizens of List 1 will continue to receive Social Security payments no matter how long they live outside of the United States.  In some other countries, List 2, a citizen may not receive U.S. Social Security benefits if those benefits are based on being a dependent or survivor of the wage earner.  Finally, some countries only permit Social Security payments for the first six months of living outside the United States.  However, if you return to live in the United States for an entire calendar month, payments will resume for another six months when you return to the foreign country. A complete explanation of these rules can be found on the Social Security website, http://www.socialsecurity.gov/pubs/10137.html (“Your Payments While You Are Outside The United States”).

Retiring overseas, therefore, creates some issues with respect to your Social Security benefits.  Before making the decision to retire, you should consult with your financial advisor and your lawyer to see just what impact living and working overseas will have on you and your income.  

Saturday, October 20, 2012

Steps Same-Sex Couples Should Take When They are Legally Unable to Marry



As the debate rages on, a majority of states do not recognize same-sex marriages.  One argument to permit committed homosexual couples to marry has been that such couples are denied some of the same rights that married heterosexual couples have.  If you live in one of the states that do not recognize same-sex marriages, there are steps you and your partner can take to replicate some of those rights.  Here are the documents you need to create:

A Health Care Directive (also known as an advance medical directive, a health care proxy, a health care agent or a living will)

Through a health care directive you appoint whom you want to make medical decisions for you when you cannot.  In Virginia, if you have not appointed a health care agent, and you are unmarried, then the law will first look to your parents to make such decisions for you, and if they are deceased, then to your siblings.  If you do not want that, then you can appoint your partner to make your health care decisions for you through a health care directive.  You can (and should) also give guidance on how you would want your medical decisions made.

A HIPPA Release and Authorization

If you want to make sure that your partner has access to you medical information, then you should execute a HIPPA release and authorization.  This tells your medical service providers that it is OK to speak with your partner about your health care issues.  Otherwise, under HIPPA rules, your doctor will not share information with your partner.

Durable Power of Attorney

Through a power of attorney, you appoint an agent who can act for you (and thus legally bind you) for a host of different things.  When you execute this document, you can give your agent broad powers to act n your behalf, or very narrow powers.  You also want to make sure that the power of attorney is durable, meaning it will be effective even if you are incapacitated.

A Living Trust

Married couples have the benefit of buying real estate as “tenants in the entirety.”  This means that they each own an undivided share of the whole.  One spouse cannot sell his or her share without the authorization of the other.  Creditors of one spouse cannot place a lien on the real property.  Tenants in the entirety also have the right of survivorship, which means that when one spouse dies, the other automatically inherits the property without the need to go through probate.

Same-sex can replicate these rights through a living trust.  The trust can be set up appointing oh partners as co-trustees, and prohibiting one trustee from selling property without the consent of the other.  A trust can also be set-up to protect the property held from the creditors of just one of the partners.  Finally, a trust can ensure that when one partner dies, the property in the trust is passed to the surviving partner, without the need to go through probate.

A Will

Although much can be accomplished through a living trust, you should still have a will to make sure that your property goes to the people you choose.  Without a will, the law of intestacy applies, which means that your blood relatives will likely inherit your property.  If here is some property you do not own through a trust, then a will is essential to ensure that the property goes in accordance with your desires.


Funeral Designation

I Virginia, you can execute a document to appoint a person to be in charge of making your funeral arrangements.  Without such  document, a funeral director may look to your family to make decisions about your funeral instead of your partner.

One word of warning with all of these documents.  Make sure that your partner is trustworthy.  If there are issues of trust in your relationship, then appointing your partner to be the person to make these decisions for you could wind up being disastrous. 

As always, it is best to consult with a lawyer to make sure your arrangements are set up the way you want them to be.

For more information, see "Same Sex Couples Can Take Steps to Replicate Some Rights of Married Heterosexual Couples".


By:  William J. Kovatch, Jr.
(703) 837-8832
info@kovatchelderlaw.com

Friday, October 19, 2012

Second Circuit Finds that U.S. Government Cannot Discriminate Against Legal Same-Sex Marriages in Applying the Estate Tax

The U.S. Court of Appeals struck down the Defense of Marriage Act in the case of Windsor v. United States.  Specifically, the Court found that section 3 of the Act, which defines marriage as the legal union between one man and one woman, violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution.

The case involved a same-sex couple who had legally married in Canada, and lived in New York.  One spouse died, leaving the other to inherit property.  The surviving spouse claim the spousal deduction for federal estate tax purposes, which was disallowed under the Defense of Marriage Act.  As a result, the estate tax bill amounted to over $300,000.

Under the Court's decision, the Federal Government would be required to recognize legal same-sex marriages when applying the federal estate tax.  In some respects, the Court's decision could be far-reaching, as legal same-sex marriages would have to be treated equally to heterosexual marriages for a variety of federal laws and programs, such as Social Security benefits, family leave and employee benefits.  On the other hand, the Second Circuit has jurisdiction only over Connecticut, New York and Vermont.  The only other federal court to find the Defense of Marriage Act to be unconstitutional is the First Circuit.  For the rest of the country, the Defense of Marriage Act remains the law of the land.  Nonetheless, the Second Circuit's decision makes it more likely that the U.S. Supreme Court will hear a case involving the Defense of Marriage Act.

I go into more detail in this article.

A New York Times article on the decision can be found here.

The text of the decision can be found here.

By:  William J. Kovatch, Jr.
(703) 837-8832
info@kovatchelderlaw.com

Thursday, September 27, 2012

Choose Your Trustees, Agents and Health Care Proxies Wisely

This week, a colleague asked me to review a trust for her. We were concentrating on the tax provisions. But what struck me most of all were the provisions concerning the Trustee.

There were instructions to the Trustee about what to do if the beneficiaries engaged in drug abuse. There was a provision about how to handle the house, because the client had feared that one sibling might use the house as a tool to bully the other. Then, to my surprise, the siblings were named as the successor co-trustees. Wow. That was odd.

As the name suggests, appointing a trustee requires trust. You have to trust that the person you appoint is going to fulfill your wishes and going to be fair with your beneficiaries. The same concept applies to appointing an agent through a power of attorney and a health care proxy or health care agent through an advance directive. If you can't trust the person, then you are giving that person way too much power.

This is where family dynamics come in. In way too many cases, people choose trustees, agents or health care proxies because they don't want there to be hurt feelings. One sibling was chosen over the other as trustee, so that must mean you favor that one. Quite frankly, I think those types of considerations should be given minimal weight in the grand scheme of things. The primary consideration should be do you trust this person to do the things you want done, while being fair to the beneficiaries. If you fear that the person you want to appoint will bully others, then you've made the wrong choice. If you appoint co-trustees because you fear one will bully the other, then you are forcing two people to work together who probably shouldn't. Again, you've made the wrong choice.

In most families, choosing an adult child as a decision-maker or fiduciary is a good choice. But, if your family dynamics is such that you cannot trust siblings to work together, then you need to make another choice.

Here are some considerations I give to my clients when choosing a trustee. Number one, trust. Can you trust this person? Number two, age and health. Is this going to be a person who will be around and able to act when you get sick or pass away? Number three, proximity. If you want a decision to be made quickly, then it may be advantageous to have someone who lives nearby to be the decision-maker, and not the adult child who lives on the other coast or on another continent.

Sometimes, we come to a point where it is clear that a friend living close by is a better choice for fiduciary than an adult child. If that is the case, don't be afraid to hurt your family's feelings. This is an important choice for you, not for them.

Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Why Parents Need an Estate Plan

Everybody should have an estate plan. But, planning is critical for parents with minor children. Surely, one of the things a new parent does is to make sure that they have life insurance to protect their young ones. Well, think of an estate plan as an extension of that life insurance.

First, and most important, every parent should think about whom they would want to raise their children if the parents were gone. This is by far the hardest thing for any parent to think about. But, it is the most critical. You don't want your children to find themselves the wards of the court. Court battles can be messy, and can take time. Meanwhile, the children may need to be in foster care until the case can be completed and a new guardian appointed. You want to make sure that you decide who is going to raise them. Plus, in Virginia, this step is easy to do. Appointing a standby guardian who can act immediately upon an emergency is a simple act of completing a one page document.

Once you know who could be taking care of your children, you need to give them the tools. In this regard, note that leaving a large sum of money to a minor directly is a bad thing. If no one is named as custodian, then there will have to be proceedings to name a guardian of the estate. This includes the appointment of a guardian ad litem to investigate the case. In Fairfax County, I've noticed that not all guardians ad litem understand the law completely and may insist that the money left to a minor, including insurance proceeds, be deposited with the court until the minor reaches eighteen. Plus, we have the added problem that under the law, any money left to a minor directly becomes the minor's money at age eighteen with no strings attached. How many eighteen year olds who you know are responsible to manage thousands of dollars given to them all at once?

The simple and most flexible solution is a living trust, either naming the potential guardian as the contingent trustee to take over after the parents' deaths, or naming another responsible person as the contingent trustee with instructions to cooperate with the potential guardian. Naming the trust as the beneficiary of life insurance proceeds should both parents pass is one way to make sure that all of the money is managed in a single, simple plan.

The point is that all of this is simple to create. It takes just a few meetings with a lawyer to plan, and some thought on the part of the parent. But, for a parent, it is one of the most critical things you can do to protect your children.

Friday, May 25, 2012

We Specialize in Small Estates

Are the executor or personal representative on a Virginia estate worth more than $50,000, but less than $200,000? These estates are particularly troublesome, because you still have to file inventories and accountings, and pay the Commissioner of Accounts filing fees as well.

We specialize in assisting with small estates, and doing it at a price that is reasonable. We have a good working relationship with a fiduciary accountant who can prepare the filings at an hourly rate that is lower than an attorney's rate. Attorney rates will only be charged for court proceedings, and reviewing the filings before they are submitted to the Commissioner of Accounts Office.

If you are responsible for an estate that is worth less than $200,000, contact William J. Kovatch, Jr. now for help.

Thursday, May 3, 2012

Giving a Gift to a Minor Through Your Estate Plan

Whether to a child, a grandchild, a special niece or nephew, many people wish to give gifts to minors through their estate plan. It can be accomplished through a will, a trust, a life insurance policy, or even by naming a beneficiary on a retirement account. Making the gift correctly can avoid a lot of hassle.

In this article, I am not addressing the tax implications through the estate tax, the gift tax or the general skipping transfer tax. I am only addressing the mechanics of how the transfer is made.

Many states, like Virginia, have the Uniform Transfer to Minors Act. If a minor is the beneficiary of a gift from a will, trust, insurance policy or other source, then the gift-giver has the power to appoint a custodian. The custodian then has the authority to hold the gift for the minor until the minor reaches 18, and use the money for the minor’s benefit.

If the gift-giver fails to name a custodian, then this can create problems. In Virginia, the person who wants to hold the property for the minor must then petition the court to be appointed the guardian of the estate of the minor. This is true, even if that person is the minor’s custodial parent. The guardian of the estate must post a bond with surety, and then comes under the supervision of the Commissioner of Accounts. Before using the money for the minor’s support, the guardian of the estate must consider all other sources of income or support for the minor. Generally, this means that the money cannot be used until the minor reaches the age of eighteen. As you can see, the need to go to court and the supervision afterwards creates a hassle and expense.

Other options in this situation can be for the Commissioner of Accounts to hold the money in an interest bearing account until the minor reaches the age of eighteen. Or, if insurance proceeds, the insurance company can hold the money until the minor reaches the age of 18.

Nonetheless, these options all leave something to be desired. It involves giving up control, and/or accepting court supervision.

The way to solve that problem is by leaving the gift through a well crafted trust. By creating a trust, the gift giver can define how the money is to be used, and when the money is to be turned over the to minor. For example, the trust can provide that the money can be used at the discretion of the trustee for the minor’s expenses. The money need not be turned over when the minor reaches age 18. Rather, if there is a concern that the minor would not be responsible enough, then the money can continue to be held in trust until the beneficiary reaches a suitable age, as defined by the gift-giver. Moreover, if the minor is disabled, as defined by Social Security law, then the trust can and should be drafted in such a way so as to avoid disqualifying the beneficiary from government benefits.

Gifts to minors through an estate plan are usually best made through a trust. For advice on how to craft such a trust to suit your specific needs and desires, call me at (703) 837-8832.

Monday, March 26, 2012

Beware the Contested Guardianship!

Guardianship proceedings exist to create protection for people who are no longer capable of making decisions for themselves. Often, a relative, such as an adult child, will bring a guardian petition when the mental abilities of an elderly person has started to deteriorate. Sometimes, a guardian petition is brought by a concerned family member to protect the elderly person from the exploitation of another.

In my experience, most guardianship petitions are uncontested and well-intentioned. But sometimes, a guardianship petition becomes just another phase in a bigger dispute among adult children. Far too often, disputes between adult siblings get heated because there is a belief that mom has money.

A contested guardianship case can become a problem quickly. In Virginia, if a guardianship petition is successful, and the elderly person's estate has the funds, all of the costs, including lawyers' fees, are paid from the elderly person's estate. If the adult children cannot agree on what is best for the elderly parent, and litigation ensues, this means that money that should be used for mom's care winds up getting eaten away by lawyers' fees.

Morally, adult children should give serious thought to just how hard they want to fight in a contested guardianship case. In fighting to control what happens to mom and her assets, the children could wind up throwing her money away.

Wednesday, March 14, 2012

Special Needs Trusts and Your Will

A colleague asked me when a special needs trust is written into a will, does a new document creating the trust need to be drafted. I answered that if the trust was created properly, then no.

However, this raised a separate question for me. Why was the special needs trust created by will, as opposed to a living trust?

To back up, a special needs trust is an instrument to make funds available to benefit a person with disabilities, so that the person would not be disqualified for public assistance. It must be drafted and administered properly, or else the funds in the trust can be considered resources, and thus disqualify the person for government programs such as Medicaid.

The problem with writing a special needs trust in the will is that the will has to be probated. Once the will is probated, here in Virginia, the Commissioner of Accounts for that county will be responsible to oversee the administration of the trust. This will necessarily involve the filing of inventories and accountings, filing fees, and the expense of hiring professionals, such as a lawyer and accountant, to make sure the filings are done properly. All of this can add to the hassle and expense of administering the trust.

A better way to handle the desire to make a special needs trust as part of an estate plan is to create the trust as part of a living trust. That way, upon death, the trust does not have to go through probate, and you do not have the watchful eye of the Commissioner of Accounts over you.

If you want to benefit a person with disabilities through your estate plan, it is best to consult a lawyer experienced and educated in special needs trusts to assist you and create the most efficient plan for you.

Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Who Will Make Your Funeral Arrangements?

While many people do not want to think about their own funeral arrangements, there are some who have some pretty strong feelings about the subject. The question is, how do you enforce your wishes, since you will not be around to direct your family?

Under Virginia law, the next of kin are entitled to make the decision regarding the disposition of a loved one's body and the funeral arrangements. But, the definition of next of kin is broad, including a spouse and any adult children. If there is disagreement, then the disagreeing next of kin can petition the circuit court.

This seems like an awful lot of trouble. It is especially problematic where a person has entered into a second marriage, or where a person is separated from his or her spouse and has not yet gotten a divorce.

Virginia law does have a solution. A person can designate an individual to be the person to make the decisions regarding the funeral arrangements and the disposition of the body. The designation must be in writing and notarized. It must also be accepted in writing.

If you feel strongly about the disposition of your body and your funeral arrangements, this should be part of your estate plan. You should put your desires in writing, and designate a person whom you trust to go through with your plan. A lawyer can help you accomplish this.